Bryan William Brickner
  • Blog
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Photos and Video
  • Links

Constitution Day ~ A day of becoming

9/17/2013

0 Comments

 
 The Signing of the US Constitution
As recorded in The Records of the Federal Convention, 17 September 1787

George Washington addresses the Convention (bold added):

When the President rose, for the purpose of putting the question, he said that although his situation had hitherto restrained him from offering his sentiments on questions depending in the House, and it might be thought, ought now to impose silence on him, yet he could not forbear expressing his wish that the alteration proposed might take place. It was much to be desired that the objections to the plan recommended might be made as few as possible – The smallness of the proportion of Representatives had been considered by many members of the Convention, an insufficient security for the rights & interests of the people. He acknowledged that it had always appeared to himself among the exceptionable parts of the plan; and late as the present moment was for admitting amendments, he thought this of so much consequence that it would give much satisfaction to see it adopted.

Yes ... "among the exceptionable parts of the plan."
Happy Constitution Day! ~ And thanks George!

0 Comments

Harlem Heights ~ 16 September 1776

9/16/2013

0 Comments

 
A chorus excerpt from: thereafter ~ (Or, The crows of Wicker Park)
A 2013 novella

Today in George Washington's life: The Battle of Harlem Heights (16 September 1776)

"~"
“My name is from 16 September 1776,” said Virginia.

“How so?” Ice asked.

“George Washington ordered some American rebels to flank the British soldiers and it worked. Two rebel leaders were casualties during the battle; Colonel Thomas Knowlton died on the field and my namesake, Major Andrew Leitch of Virginia, died 13 days later. Washington ordered the call and response – the passwords – for the next day to be ‘Leitch’ and ‘Virginia’ – for the mortally wounded Major.”

“So your name was first spoken on 17 September 1776?”

“Yeah – I guess it was.”

"~"

0 Comments

Federalist #55 and the Battle of Kip's Bay ~ 15 September 1776

9/15/2013

0 Comments

 
Excerpt from Chapter 3:8, Oligarchy
The Book of the Is (2013)

Today in George Washington's life: The Battle of Kip's Bay ~ 15 September 1776

8

Recall the Federalists supported ratification. Three of them, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, wrote a collection of essays called The Federalist Papers. At the time of ratification, the Federalists defended the concept of constitutional representation. They wrote essays to the people of New York to convince them to ratify the Constitution (which New York did). The documents make clear, and we will go into some detail below, that the Federalists believed one Representative for every 30,000 inhabitants would make the House safe, and also more importantly, keep it safe, in its role of balancing power.

The Convention designed the House to be a dynamic institution, bound to change, with an equal place in power. It was built to channel factionalism into representative government.

As the country grew in population, the ratifiers knew the number of Representatives would also grow. Writing in Federalist 55, Madison projected: “At the expiration of twenty-five years, according to the computed rate of increase, the number of representatives will amount to two hundred, and of fifty years, to four hundred.”

The Convention agreed that the Legislative Branch would represent the people and the states. This was one of the early key compromises – called the Connecticut Compromise. They agreed to divide the legislature into two sections to split the law-making power. State representation was set at two members for all, thus making large and small states equal. The House of Representatives is where size mattered: as a state’s population grew, so would representation. For example, Delaware and New York would be represented equally in the Senate with two members, and the difference in population would be represented in the House.

If we look at Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, we can find what was agreed to and ratified. This section included the most recognizable failure of the Constitution: the “three fifths” deal. At the Convention, Southern states wanted slaves to count toward representation; Northern states didn’t. The “compromise” was to count: “the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons [slaves].” This aspect of Clause 3 was replaced by the 14th Amendment (1868).

Clause 3 also states that a census must be taken within three years of ratification – and it was – and that every ten years a census be taken for the purpose of representation – and it has been. Clause 3 also apportioned the first House based on agreement. Since there wasn’t a census to work with, they simply agreed to the number of Representatives for each state. These numbers were based on a state’s estimated population; for example, it was proposed that New York would begin with six Representatives and Delaware with one.

In the Senate the founders agreed to two Senators for each state; for the House they chose this wording: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative.” At the time, this theory of representation – that one could represent 30,000 – it was a big deal. In the state legislatures of the period, the representation ratio was often much lower. For example, we read in Federalist 55, that in Pennsylvania the ratio was one for every four or five thousand, in Rhode Island one for a thousand, and in several Georgia districts they had an incredibly low ratio of one for ten.

People at the time realized, and we should also, that there is no magic number when it comes to ratios and representation. Madison knew this and said so in Federalist 55: “Nothing can be more fallacious than to found our political calculations on arithmetical principles.” One for every 30,000 isn’t a magical ratio that solves all of our problems and makes everyone happy. In fact, Madison warns us of thinking that a large assembly will make us a better nation. His fear of the mob was evident: “In all very numerous assemblies, of whatever character composed, passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason. Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob.”

George Washington is our Socrates. He presided over the drafting of our Constitution as President of the Convention and chose not to speak during the deliberations. He was silent (during debates) until the last day, 17 September 1787. After the proposed Constitution had been read aloud, he rose and announced a request. He asked those gathered to make one change: he asked them to lower the ratio for representation from, “one for every forty Thousand,” to “one for every thirty Thousand.” The request was unanimously approved and the change was made – then they signed it.

Remember that moment: George Washington, war hero, deliverer and arguably the person most responsible for our revolution, he requested a lowering of the ratio to provide the House with more power. Yet every time since then, the Representatives have declined to keep the ratio lower: it’s in their interest, and not ours, to keep representation small. Twenty-one censuses in a row and you’d think just once we’d side with Washington’s leadership on We the People’s House.

0 Comments

Federalist #56

9/14/2013

0 Comments

 
Excerpt from Chapter 3:9, Oligarchy
The Book of the Is (2013)

9
In Federalist 56, Madison defends the House against the charge that it: “will be too small to possess a due knowledge of the interests of its constituents.” The founders wanted to insure local interests were represented; Madison’s theories require Representatives to bring local knowledge to the federal House. The founders also believed: “every Representative will have much information to acquire concerning all other States.”

The House wasn’t (just) designed as a place to make laws: it was designed as a place of knowledge as well. Not only would a large House send more Representatives to Washington, it would also send more Representatives back home with new knowledge. The initial House had 65 members: the current has 435. It’s hard to see how 435 can come home and let 300 million of us know what’s going on – thus the form letters. 
0 Comments

Federalist #57

9/13/2013

0 Comments

 
Excerpt from Chapter 3:10, Oligarchy
The Book of the Is (2013)

10
In Federalist 57, the charge is found in the title of the essay: The Alleged Tendency of the New Plan to Elevate the Few at the Expense of the Many Considered in Connection with Representation. This one paints a portrait of a House of Representatives from the general population. Madison asks: “Who are to be the electors of the federal representatives?” We the People is the easy answer, but he wrote it supremely:

Not the rich, more than the poor; not the learned, more than the ignorant; not the haughty heirs of distinguished names, more than the humble sons of obscurity and unpropitious fortune. The electors are to be the great body of the people of the United States.

As there would be no qualification for office (“not of wealth, of birth, of religious faith, or of civil profession”), the people would choose a local to “confer the representative trust.” In the voice of someone who believed in conferring the representative trust, Madison anticipated the relationship between the Representative and constituent to be based on: “Duty, gratitude, interest, and ambition itself.”

Again from Federalist 57:

The city of Philadelphia is supposed to contain between fifty and sixty thousand souls. It will therefore form nearly two districts for the choice of federal representatives.

Today, with an approximate population of sixty thousand souls, Dubuque, Iowa would be equal to the founders’ Philadelphia. Today with 1.5 million souls, Philadelphia would warrant more than fifty federal Representatives under Constitutional Representation.    
0 Comments

Federalist #58

9/12/2013

0 Comments

 
Excerpt from Chapter 3:11, Oligarchy
The Book of the Is (2013)


11
The previous charge might raise some eyebrows as it looks a lot like what has happened. We can look at why Madison said this wouldn’t happen, as discussed in Federalist 58, and maybe we can see why one for every thirty Thousand is a fair and agreed upon number.

In Federalist 58, Madison again places the charge to be defended in the title: “Objection That The Number of Members Will Not Be Augmented as the Progress of Population Demands Considered.” Madison and the others saw the problem clearly and even anticipated what we now face. Here is also where we see an assumption made by the Constitutional Convention breakdown: the founders thought the large states would defend this principle.

Perhaps it just hasn’t happened yet, as it probably will be the large states that will demand House augmentation. Madison: “There is a peculiarity in the federal Constitution which insures a watchful attention in a majority both of the people and of their representatives to a constitutional augmentation of the latter.”

I see how Madison is still going to be correct; he and the others thought augmentation would take place because the general population in the larger states would demand it. If states like California, New York, Texas, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio, if they demanded constitutional representation, they would achieve it.

This “peculiarity” hasn’t materialized only because the large states haven’t demanded it. Madison wrote that from the interest of the large states: “it may with certainty be inferred that the larger States will be strenuous advocates for increasing the number and weight of that part of the legislature in which their influence predominates.” Madison argued that if there were problems, the general population could step in by building a coalition of the constitutionally willing:

Should the representatives or people, therefore, of the smaller States oppose at any time a reasonable addition of members, a coalition of a very few States will be sufficient to overrule the opposition; a coalition which, notwithstanding the rivalship and local prejudices which might prevent it on ordinary occasions, would not fail to take place, when not merely prompted by common interest, but justified by equity and the principles of the Constitution.

0 Comments

"Is Pot Better Than Soda?" ~ A Dialogue With Stephen Young

9/10/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture

By Bryan W. Brickner and Stephen Young
    Steve and Bryan have been writing together about cannabis and cannabinoids for more than a decade; sometimes the news is just too much …
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/8/prweb11081001.htm
31 August 2013 / The Compassion Chronicles

0 Comments

    Author

    Brickner has a 1997 political science doctorate from Purdue University, cofounded Illinois NORML in 2001, and was a 2007 National NORML Cannabis Advocate Awardee. He is also publisher and coauthor of the 2011 book banned by the Illinois Department of Corrections – The Cannabis Papers: A Citizen’s Guide to Cannabinoids.

    Archives

    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    October 2012

    Categories

    All
    17 September
    22nd Amendment
    2 AG
    2-AG
    435
    502nd Infantry
    5 HT
    5-HT
    5-HT
    5 HTP
    5-HTP
    7th Amendment
    9 April 1792
    Aborigine
    A Cabal
    Acetylcholine
    Adam Smith
    Aesop
    Aging
    Akhil Reed Amar
    Albert Hoffman
    Alcohol
    Alexander Hamilton
    Alexander R. Boteler
    Alice In Wonderland
    Alzheimer's/Dementia
    Ambrose Burnside
    American Revolution
    Anandamide
    Andrew Leitch
    Antietam/Sharpsburg
    Anti Republic
    Anti-Republic
    Anti-Semitism
    Archie Lieberman
    Art
    Artemis
    Article The First
    Aspasia Of Miletus
    Athena
    Augustus Kotka
    Bastogne
    Benjamin F. Cheatham
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bivalency
    Black Hawk War 1832
    Brain Gut Axis
    Brain-gut Axis
    Bringing It Home
    Burning Man
    California
    Cancer
    Candide
    Cannabinoids
    Cannabinoid System
    Cannabis
    Carcinogenesis
    Caryophyllene
    Caudate Putamen
    Cb1
    Cb2
    CB2 GPR55 Heteromers
    CB2-GPR55 Heteromers
    CBD
    Cheatham Hill
    Chicago
    Circulatory System
    Cluster Headache
    CNS
    Colitis
    Comrades
    Confederate
    Conservative-Liberal (CL)
    Constitutio Libertatis
    Constitution
    Daimon
    Daniel Morgan
    David Bradford
    David Redick
    Depression
    Despotism
    DHA
    Didaskalos
    Digestive System
    Domestic Tranquility
    Donald Trump
    Dopamine System
    Douglas Southall Freeman
    Dubuque
    Earth Day
    Eisenhower
    Elbridge Gerry
    Electoral College
    Emperor Napoleon
    Endocrine System
    Enumeration
    EPA
    Epilepsy
    Er
    Estrogen
    Exercise
    Ex Falso Quodlibet
    FAKE News
    Federalist 57
    Florida
    Fort Sumter
    Founders
    Francis P. Blair
    Freedom
    Free Markets Cannabis Act (FMCA)
    French Revolution
    GABA
    Gallant Fourteenth
    Georges Danton
    George Thomas
    George Washington
    Georg Groddeck
    Gettysburg
    Gideon
    Gliomas
    Glutamate
    Goddesses
    Government Grown
    Gpr55
    Graham Greene
    Hannah Arendt
    Harlem Heights
    Headache
    Hedonism
    Hemp
    Henry Knox
    Henry Kyd Douglas
    Henry Lee III
    Herbaceutical
    Herbiceutical
    Heteromers
    Hillary Clinton
    Homeostasis
    Horatio Gates
    Hot-flash-reduction
    Hypothalamic-neurohypophyseal
    Ice
    Illinois
    Immigrants
    Immune System
    Indiana
    Indiana 99th Regiment
    Indole-quinuclidine-analogs
    Inflammation
    Irritable Bowel Syndrome Ibs
    It
    Jack-herer
    James Monroe
    James Rumsey
    James W. Foley
    James Wilkinson
    Jean Baudrillard
    Jefferson Davis
    Jesus
    Jim-champion
    Joe
    Johann Palm
    John Adams
    John Bunyan
    John Finley Pettigrew
    John F Kennedy
    John-jay
    John Locke
    John Mosby
    Johnny Reb
    John Roberts
    Jonathan Magbie
    Kaiser Wilhelm
    Keith Marker
    Knowbody
    Kynurenine
    Lil Man
    Liminal
    Lincoln
    Lipids
    Louis Armstrong
    LSS
    Lt
    Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Lsd
    Madison
    March-madness
    Marijuana
    Martin Luther
    Maximilien Robespierre
    Melanocortin Circuit
    'Mericans
    Michigan
    Microbiota
    Migraine
    Mitochondria
    Molly Role
    Monroe Doctrine
    Montesquieu
    Morphine
    Mt-vernon
    Muggles
    Multiple-sclerosis
    Nabiximols-sativex
    Nazis
    Nemesis
    New York
    Nietzsche
    North Carolina
    Nowhere
    Nuclear Receptors
    Obama
    Obesity
    Ohio
    Once Upon A Time
    Opioid
    Otto Snow
    Pain Relief
    Paraquat
    Parmenides
    Parthenongenesis
    Patrick-henry
    Paula Lind Ayers
    Peace Terms
    Pediatric
    Pericles
    Philadelphia
    Phototherapy
    Physiodelia
    Physiology System
    Pituitary-stalk
    Plato
    Pot
    Pregnancy
    President Taylor
    Psilocybin
    PTSD
    Publius
    Puritans
    Putin
    Quakers
    Race
    Ra Chaka
    Ralph Waldo Emerson
    R. Bruce Dold
    Representation
    Reproductive System
    Republic
    Respiratory-system
    Richard Lee I
    Rick Simpson
    Robert Dahl
    Robert E. Lee
    Roman Republic
    Sarah Tonin
    Sarajevo
    Secession
    Serotonin System
    Shall
    Shivitti
    Silent Night
    Skeletal System
    Slavery
    Sleep
    Snake And Turkey
    Socrates
    Sophie Scholl
    Sophocles
    South Carolina
    Sperm
    Spermatogenesis
    Spermatozoa
    Sport
    Star Of David
    Stephen Young
    Suicidal
    Sun Tzu
    Sweat
    Tell Lie Vision
    Tell-Lie-Vision
    Texas
    THC
    The Boys
    The Cannabis Papers
    The Federalist Papers
    The-federalist-papers
    The Few
    The Lost Special Orders #191
    The Many
    The Quiet American (1955)
    The Unrepresented
    Thirty Thousand
    Thirty-thousand
    Thomas-jefferson
    Thomas Knowlton
    Thomas Sumpter (Sumter)
    Three Fifths Representation
    Three-fifths Representation
    Tom Paine
    Tory Crown
    Traumatic Brain Injury
    Trenton
    Truck Drivers
    Tryptophan
    Tsar Nicholas
    Tuscarora / Hemp Gatherers
    US Grant
    Us Supreme Court
    Usurpation
    Usurpecans
    Valkyrie
    Vanilloid-system
    Veritas
    Veterans
    Vietnam
    Virginia
    Visual-system
    Walter-benjamin
    Weed
    West Virginia
    We The People
    We-the-people
    Whiskey Rebellion
    White Rose
    William-abens
    William Findley
    William Washington
    Wine
    Winfield Scott
    Women
    Yale
    Yankee Doodle Dandy
    Zarathustra

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.